AHPRA, AMA, CDC, ECHA, EPA, FCC, FDA, FSA, FSMB, FTC, GMC, Health Australia, HHS, MHRA, NIH, NHS, TGA, UN, USDA, WHO: More than 100 references showing evidence of systemic corruption.
Regulatory and professional organizations entrusted to protect food, air, water, soil, and medicines are corrupted and causing devastating harm. A wealth of verifiable evidence here.
Overview
These government agencies and professional oversight organizations were created to conduct protective functions on behalf of the citizens who authorized their formation. The missions of these organizations are centered on regulating companies and systems that impact our food, medicine, air and water.
In good faith, we handed over our power to agencies meant to serve the public, but evidence shows they now serve corporate interests.
Scroll down for a compilation covering all agencies, or select the links to read posts dedicated to each.
AHPRA, AMA — Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency + Australian Medical Association
AMA, AAP — American Medical Association + American Academy of Pediatrics
CDC, ACIP & VAERS — U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention + Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices + Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
ECHA & REACH — European Chemicals Agency + REACH Regulation
EPA — U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
FCC — Federal Communications Commission
FDA — U.S. Food and Drug Administration
FSA — U.K. Food Standards Agency
FSMB, MCNZ— Federation of State Medical Boards + Medical Council of New Zealand
FTC — U.S. Federal Trade Commission
GMC — U.K. General Medical Council
Health (Australia) — Department of Health and Aged Care + Science and Industry Technical Advisory Group
HHS, CICP, NTP & DGAC — U.S. Department of Health and Human Services + Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program + National Toxicology Program + Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee
MHRA — U.K. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
NIH, ODS, DSHEA — U.S. National Institutes of Health + Office of Dietary Supplements + Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act
NHS — National Health Service of England
TGA, PBS, & PBAC — Therapeutic Goods Administration of Australia + Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme + Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee
UN — United Nations (includes WHO, UNICEF, IMF, the World Bank, UNESCO, UNRWA, UNHCR, IAEA) [source]
USDA — U.S. Department of Agriculture
WHO — World Health Organization
These “Public Servants” Have Made a Mockery of People’s Trust
Tasked as public servants, regulatory agencies have made a mockery of people’s trust.
Authorized Narrative (Propaganda) — Regulatory agencies act on behalf of citizens to safeguard food, air, water, soil and medicines.
Evidence-Based Narrative (Truth) — Agencies that were entrusted to protect the most fundamental and vital aspects of human and planetary life are, in fact, corrupted, causing devastating harm.
Verifiable Evidence — See below for a lengthy list of verifiable evidence, representing decades (and in some cases more than a century) of betrayal and corruption.
What to Do with the Overwhelming Evidence Below?
By entrusting government agencies to act on our behalf, we are responsible for their actions. As extensive evidence shows in this series of curated reports, these institutions have failed to protect the citizens and principled professionals who entrusted them.
Instead, they protect the corporations and powers that control them. Beyond just neglecting their duty, these agencies enable and protect corporations that are “essentially psychopathic, being amoral and without conscience”, causing devastating harm to people and the planet.
In order to halt these harms and right the wrongs, we must first know the truth of what these organizations have done. This page offers a curated body of evidence to support that effort.
Reclaiming our power begins with everyday decisions — such as how we source food and medicine. It grows as we withdraw support from compromised institutions and build decentralized collectives that honor human agency and uphold accountability.
AHPRA, AMA
What They Say They Do
AHPRA (Australian Health Practitioner Regulatory Agency) — "The AHPRA works in partnership with the National Boards to ensure that Australia’s registered health practitioners are suitably trained, qualified and safe to practise. Public safety is our priority." [source]
AMA (Australian Medical Association) — “Representing doctors, the AMA works with governments to develop and influence health policy to provide the best outcomes for doctors, their patients, and the community.” [source]
What They Actually Do
AHPRA: “Not Only Regulatory Over-Reach, But Regulatory Capture”
AHPRA—the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency—emerged in 2010 with a promise… to ensure competence, to safeguard care, to uphold trust. It was a noble vow, one we clung to in faith. But that faith has been gutted, replaced by a creeping horror as AHPRA’s true face emerges. This isn’t a protector; it’s a predator, a bureaucratic leviathan that feasts on dissent and starves the public of truth. Not only regulatory over-reach but regulatory capture—where power bends to political whims rather than public good—has turned a watchdog into a weapon, and the wounds it inflicts are bleeding out across the nation. How do I know-I see it every day. Doctors who dared to question, who leaned on evidence over edict, became prey. – Dr. Ian Brighthope
"AHPRA has morphed into a ruthless enforcer of government health policy and an instrument of harm"
In a scathing indictment of Australia’s health regulator, Kara Thomas, Secretary of the Australian Medical Professionals Society, exposes AHPRA’s alarming transformation. Once a guardian of public health AHPRA has morphed into a ruthless enforcer of government health policy and an instrument of harm, posing a real threat to public health. This dangerous development in Australia’s medical history is cause for serious concern among healthcare professionals. It threatens the independence of medical practitioners and potentially compromises patient care by prioritising policy enforcement over fully informed, patient focused medicine. – New Zealand Doctors
AMA propagandized for vaccination without verifiable evidence of safety and efficacy
During the interview on Today, Dr Perry emphasised the role of the AMA in speaking for the profession:
“The AMA is the mouthpiece, the organisation that represents doctors…we talk for the doctors.”
If that was the case, the statements made by senior office-holders of the AMA during 2021 cannot be dismissed as personal opinion — they were presented as the voice of the medical profession. Dr Perry warned viewers:
“Life will be miserable without being vaccinated… So get vaccinated. Otherwise, you’re going to have a very, very lonely life and you’re not going to be able to maintain your employment.”
… On what basis were the AMA’s office-holders speaking with such certainty about mass vaccination policy?… Below is the email I sent to Dr Khorshid on 14 January 2021, the day after his ABC interview aired, asking what evidence supported his statement that “…we need everybody to be vaccinated” and that vaccination would make people “immune to the virus”… I did not receive a response. – Elizabeth Hart
“It’s absolutely flabbergasting to watch this registered medical practitioner effectively threaten millions of people in flagrant breach of practitioners’ obligation to obtain valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination, as for any medical intervention.” — “An Australian doctor, Chris Perry, used his status as a surgeon and (then) President of the Australian Medical Association Queensland, to threaten the Australian people into unquestioningly submitting to Covid-19 vaccination mandates in December 2021.” — Elizabeth Hart
“This is a classic institutional brush-off” — “This is a classic institutional brush-off, with the Ombudsman’s office closing ranks around AHPRA, rather than grappling with the substance of my complaint about systemic regulatory failure at AHPRA… It’s impossible to obtain valid voluntary informed consent from people who are under duress to comply, i.e. people who are being threatened they will lose their job and participation in society if they refuse to submit to vaccination mandates.” — Elizabeth Hart
“AHPRA was created to protect patients, but it has drifted into protecting the state from scrutiny.” — “The demise of the caring medical profession caused by regulatory over-reach.” — Dr. Ian Brighthope
“As suicides mount and doctors face increasing persecution, calls for an investigation into Australia’s medical regulator intensify.” — “Under the guise of protecting the public, the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) has fostered a climate of fear within the medical profession, bullying doctors, driving them to quit, and contributing to a growing number of suicides.” — Maryanne Demasi PhD
“The Misdeeds of AHPRA. Fighting for the best working environment for our profession.” — “Healthcare professionals in Australia should attend the ‘Accountability Australia’ conference for several crucial reasons, all stemming from the significant concerns surrounding the actions and lack of accountability of the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA).” — Dr. Ian Brighthope
“Institutional Dogma, Not Scientific Stewardship” — “The AMA’s position is undermined by internal contradictions, selective use of evidence standards, paternalistic assumptions about patients, and a failure to acknowledge the well-documented limitations and harms of conventional medical practice.” — Dr. Ian Brighthope
AMA, AAP
What They Say They Do
AMA (American Medical Association) — "Throughout history, the AMA has always followed its mission: to promote the art and science of medicine and the betterment of public health." [source]
AAP (American Academy of Pediatrics) — “The mission of the American Academy of Pediatrics is to attain optimal physical, mental, and social health and well-being for all infants, children, adolescents and young adults. To accomplish this, AAP shall support the professional needs of its members.” [source]
What They Actually Do
Four months after Purdue Pharma execs pled guilty to felony charges for misleading regulators and physicians about the dangers of OxyContin, the AMA suggested in its continuing education course that doctors were still too tentative about prescribing narcotics for pain.
It was September 2007, and doctors were prescribing enough opioid painkillers each year for every American adult to have a bottle of the addictive pills. Overdoses were at a historic high and showed no signs of slowing down. Just four months earlier, executives at Purdue Pharma had pleaded guilty to felony charges for misleading regulators and physicians about the dangers of OxyContin. In light of this news, one might have expected the AMA—the prestigious organization that bills itself as the “unified voice” of America’s doctors dedicated to “the art and science of medicine and the betterment of public health”—to bring attention to the crisis in its newly updated continuing education course on how to treat pain. Instead, the 12-module training suggested that doctors were still too tentative about prescribing narcotics. “The effectiveness of opioid therapy may be undermined by misconceptions about their risks, particularly risks associated with abuse and addiction,” read materials from one session. The class included ideas like “pseudoaddiction,” referring to when pain patients seem “inappropriately drug seeking,” but aren’t truly addicted—rather, they just needed more pills. Between 2002 and 2018, the AMA and the organization’s philanthropic arm, the AMA Foundation, received more than $3 million from Purdue Pharma.
“AAP Members with Ties to GLP-1 Drugmakers Helped Write Weight-Loss Drug Guidelines for Kids”
In January 2023, the AAP issued new clinical guidelines for treating childhood obesity. The guidelines recommend physicians offer GLP-1 weight-loss drugs and bariatric surgery to obese children.
The AAP “demands that medical exemptions be limited, ignoring the plight of vaccine injured families”
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has launched an unprecedented assault on religious liberty, demanding that all U.S. states eliminate all exemptions—religious or philosophical—for childhood vaccines. They also demand that medical exemptions be limited, ignoring the plight of vaccine injured families and threatening to subject these children to further vaccine damage.
JAMA, AAP: “Textbook garbage‑in, garbage‑out”
Recent JAMA coverage attempts to normalize AAP and ACOG’s stand‑alone Covid‑19 vaccination policies for infants and for pregnancy after CDC reversed or narrowed its federal recommendations. However, we see the cracks all over their veneer… The studies that AAP/ACOG lean on—registry cohorts, test‑negative designs, and modeling exercises—import unresolved biases at the design stage. On just one point alone, co-administration of different vaccines in the same office visit, no robust data exist… Recommendations built on that weak scaffolding transmit those biases unchanged. That is textbook garbage‑in, garbage‑out.
“The American Academy of Pediatrics is financially compromised”
The American Academy of Pediatrics recently published what they call a “fact check” on vaccines and autism—a document so riddled with omissions, conflicts of interest, and scientific sleight-of-hand that it serves as a perfect case study in institutional gaslighting… Let’s dissect this propaganda piece masquerading as medical guidance and expose the uncomfortable truths the AAP desperately wants to hide.
“The AAP is structured to prioritize its members’ income over children’s well-being, according to David Bell, senior scholar at Brownstone Institute and a former medical officer and scientist at the World Health Organization”
The AAP uses rare measles outbreaks to justify removing personal and religious vaccine exemptions, despite measles mortality already being near zero before mass vaccination began. Ignoring preventive strategies, the AAP’s approach sets children up for lifelong dependence on pharmaceutical products rather than building lasting health.
“‘Historically, the AAP has hidden its funding sources’ and ‘it has been impossible to learn…what that money earns’”
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), which… has called for the end to religious exemptions, received tens of millions of dollars in federal funding in a single year, according to public records. AAP received $34,974,759 in government grants during the 2023 fiscal year, according to the organization’s most recent tax disclosure… The federal grants are in addition to financial contributions the AAP receives from several major pharmaceutical companies, including Eli Lilly, GSK, Merck, Moderna and Sanofi.
“American Academy of Pediatrics Hit With Federal RICO Lawsuit for Vaccine Safety Fraud” — “AAP accused of operating a decades-long racketeering scheme that deceived America about vaccine safety for maximum profit.” — Nicolas Hulscher MPH See also: “Doctors sue AAP over unproven vaccine safety claims” by Anne Dachel and Parents, doctors, and CHD sue AAP in one of the most important lawsuits in medical history by Steve Kirsch
“The American Academy of Pediatrics: Mining Children for Profit” — “Funded by sources including Moderna, Merck, Sanofi, GSK, Eli Lilly, and other pharmaceutical companies, the AAP’s members are the cornerstone of the rapidly increasing pediatric pharma market in North America – by far greater than any other region. As a professional organization dedicated to ensuring income for its members, the AAP is like any similar professional association or union and acts in this manner.” — David Bell, Brownstone Institute
“American Academy of Pediatrics Recommends mRNA for Infants” — “In the United States, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) issued new recommendations [in August 2025] that infants as young as 6 months should receive Covid-19 mRNA booster injections. This move directly contradicts Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who earlier this year removed COVID-19 shots recommendations for healthy children from the CDC schedule. The AAP is doubling down, insisting babies and toddlers ‘must be protected’—even as federal authorities begin acknowledge their risks.” — Nicolas Hulscher MPH See also: Leading Pediatrician Group Defies CDC, Tells Parents to Get Covid Shots for Infants, Kids by Michael Nevradakis PhD and Why is America’s paediatric academy still pushing Covid vaccines for children? by Maryanne Demasi and How the American Academy of Pediatrics Betrayed Children Everywhere by Dr. Clayton J. Baker MD and Insanity: American Academy of Pediatrics Demands All Infants Be Vaccinated for Covid by Lioness of Judah Ministry and Frank Bergman and American Academy of Pediatrics Recommends Covid-19 Vaccine for Infants, Toddlers by Zachary Stieber and US pediatricians’ new Covid-19 shot recommendations differ from CDC advice by AP News
AAP: “This is not science. It is bureaucratic dogma enforced through censorship, coercion, and regulatory capture.” — “For decades, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has enjoyed unchallenged authority over childhood health, particularly vaccines… The CDC has never properly tested the full 72+ dose childhood vaccine schedule for safety. Despite two decades of warnings from the Institute of Medicine (IOM), no cumulative safety studies have been conducted…. The AAP pushed for elimination of all religious and philosophical exemptions in 2025, despite achieving herd immunity thresholds. Adverse events documented in the VAERS database are ignored, while guidelines continue to expand.” — Sayer Ji
“The AAP continues to advocate various faddish trends that have caused real physical damage to our youth” — “HHS has terminated multiple federal grants to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), totaling around $18-20 million, and for good reason. Consider their recent track record. They have presided over the greatest decline to the health of our children that America has ever seen.” — Dr. Robert W. Malone See also: Beware the American Academy of Pediatricians by Bill Rice Jr.
MedPage Today Article Reveals AMA’s True Mission Focus: Revenue Over Responsibility — “In a stunning admission, the allegedly neutral AMA calls for fighting for profits before care.” — James Lyons-Weiler PhD
AMA Corrupted, Promotes Products for Businesses — “The AMA urges
